{"id":6996,"date":"2024-11-01T11:30:38","date_gmt":"2024-11-01T11:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/?post_type=blog&p=6996"},"modified":"2024-11-08T11:54:17","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T11:54:17","slug":"supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia","status":"publish","type":"blog","link":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Administrative Court Ensures Urgent Processing for Residence Permit Application"},"content":{"rendered":"

STA \u2013 Case No. 741\/23.4BELSB<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a decision issued in Case No. 741\/23.4BELSB, the 1st Chamber of the Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the procedural regime for urgent measures to protect rights, freedoms, and guarantees applies to a residence permit application in accordance with Article 110 and following the Code of Procedure in Administrative Courts (CPTA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The appeal concerned the rejection of a request for urgent protection of rights, freedoms, and guarantees related to a residence permit application that had been pending for over four years without a definitive administrative decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The appellant filed a request for urgent protection of rights, freedoms, and guarantees, seeking to compel the Immigration and Borders Service (SEF), now replaced by the Agency for Integration, Migration, and Asylum (AIMA, I.P.), to decide on the application submitted on 05\/05\/2020 and consequently issue the requested residence permit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Lisbon Administrative Court did not admit the request for urgent protection of rights, freedoms, and guarantees, leading to an appeal to the Southern Central Administrative Court (TCA Sul), which denied the appeal on 11.01.2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its ruling of June 6, the Supreme Administrative Court noted that the delay in deciding the residence permit application was unreasonable, violating the 90-day legal deadline prescribed by law (cf. Article 82, No. 1 of Law No. 23\/2007, of July 4).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The STA held that the guarantee of a decision on the residence permit must be considered urgent, as it is \u201cessential for the Appellant to be able to realize his right to legal integration into the labour market, and to materially enjoy other rights, such as security, tranquillity, freedom of movement, and health.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Para al\u00e9m do mais, apontou \u201ca urg\u00eancia verificada na situa\u00e7\u00e3o dos autos n\u00e3o \u00e9 uma urg\u00eancia cautelar, tratando-se antes de uma urg\u00eancia na obten\u00e7\u00e3o de decis\u00e3o de m\u00e9rito<\/em>\u201d. Bem assim o STA concedeu \u201cFurthermore, it pointed out that \u201cthe urgency in the present case is not precautionary but rather pertains to obtaining a decision on the merits.\u201d As a result, the STA upheld \u201cthe appeal filed by the Appellant and consequently overturned the ruling issued by TCA Sul, with the case to proceed as an urgent measure to protect rights, freedoms, and guarantees, under Article 110 and following of the CPTA, ordering the case to be sent back to the First Instance for appropriate action.\u201d<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This decision could have significant implications for ensuring the rights of immigrants who intend to apply for a residence permit (temporary or permanent) or who are awaiting a decision from AIMA, I.P.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We invite everyone to follow the Observat\u00f3rio<\/a> on social media for more relevant and up-to-date content on Constitutional Justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The full text of the ruling is available here<\/a>. \u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"template":"","meta":[],"categoria-blog-observatorio":[77,75],"cluster":[51],"grupo-de-investigacao":[],"class_list":["post-6996","blog","type-blog","status-publish","hentry","categoria-blog-observatorio-direito_administrativo","categoria-blog-observatorio-direitos-fundamentais","cluster-observatorio-de-justica-constitucional"],"yoast_head":"\nSupremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lisbon Public Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-08T11:54:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-01T11:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-08T11:54:17+00:00\",\"description\":\"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\\\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Lisbon Public Law\",\"description\":\"Public Law Research Centre in Lisbon\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lisbon Public Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-19-at-11.01.50-1.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-19-at-11.01.50-1.jpeg\",\"width\":354,\"height\":354,\"caption\":\"Lisbon Public Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law","description":"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law","og_description":"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.","og_url":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/","og_site_name":"Lisbon Public Law","article_modified_time":"2024-11-08T11:54:17+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/","url":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/","name":"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia - Lisbon Public Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-11-01T11:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-08T11:54:17+00:00","description":"Em decis\u00e3o proferida no Processo n\u00ba 741\/23.4BELSB, a 1\u00aa Sec\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo decidiu pela adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime processual de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia, de acordo com o prescrito no art.\u00ba 110.\u00ba e seguintes do C\u00f3digo de Processo nos Tribunal Administrativos (CPTA).O recurso tratava do indeferimento de pedido de intima\u00e7\u00e3o para a prote\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos, liberdades e garantias no relativo a um pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia que se encontrava pendente h\u00e1 mais de quatro anos sem decis\u00e3o administrativa definitiva.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/supremo-tribunal-administrativo-garante-regime-de-urgencia\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Supremo Tribunal Administrativo garante regime de urg\u00eancia para an\u00e1lise de pedido de concess\u00e3o de autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o de resid\u00eancia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/","name":"Lisbon Public Law","description":"Public Law Research Centre in Lisbon","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#organization","name":"Lisbon Public Law","url":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-19-at-11.01.50-1.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-19-at-11.01.50-1.jpeg","width":354,"height":354,"caption":"Lisbon Public Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog\/6996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/blog"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"categoria-blog-observatorio","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categoria-blog-observatorio?post=6996"},{"taxonomy":"cluster","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cluster?post=6996"},{"taxonomy":"grupo-de-investigacao","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lisbonpubliclaw.pt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/grupo-de-investigacao?post=6996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}